Mainstream?

EarsToHear.net
He That Has Ears To Hear, Let Him Hear (Matthew 11:15-30)
Challenging both secular wisdom and religious doctrines. - Will our descendants know moral virtue?

Back to Wall of Separation? Index

Are you "mainstream" according to Liberals, Media, & Hollywood?
"Mainstream American" or "Mainstream Democrat?"

"Liberty is a word which, according as it is used, comprehends the most good and the most evil of any in the world. Justly understood it is sacred next to those which we appropriate in divine adoration; but in the mouths of some it means anything, which enervate a necessary government; excite a jealousy of the rulers who are our own choice, and keep society in confusion for want of a power sufficiently concentered to promote good." Oliver Ellsworth (A Landholder, No. III, 19 November 1787) Reference: Essays on the Constitution of the United States, Ford, ed. (146); original The Connecticut Courant [Sheehan (4:4)]

Thomas Sowell - “Journalists cannot serve two masters. To the extent that they take on the task of suppressing information or biting their tongue for the sake of some political agenda, they are betraying the trust of the public and corrupting their own profession. It is bad enough that politicians betray their followers as a matter of expediency. It is real chutzpah when they demand that journalists betray the public trust as a matter of principle, for the benefit of politicians. Some journalists—too many, in fact—do jump on the bandwagon of particular candidates or particular political agendas, and end up filtering and spinning the news as a result. Those who are on the ‘global warming’ bandwagon, for example, endlessly repeat that the polar ice cap in the arctic is shrinking—while filtering out the fact that the polar ice cap in the Antarctic is growing... Whether one is for or against the ‘global warming’ crusade or for or against Democrats or Republicans in the White House, the truth is the truth—and filtering out facts is betraying the public that has turned to the media for information. It is legitimate to argue for or against those who believe that global warming justifies one policy or another. That is an honest expression of opinion. But filtering the facts is not. Some in the media seem to think that a noble cause justifies withholding facts on the other side.”

More to contemplate at: Liberals, Hollywood, Media

Do you blame America first in regards to terrorism, as many liberal media outlets and "higher-education professors" do?
Just to keep the Bush-hatred rhetoric flowing, do you conveniently overlook the fact that most of the world in early 2003, including liberals, believed Saddam had WMD capabilities?
Do you believe the Gitmo detainees captured as enemy combatants should be released? Yet at the same time ignore what happens in Castro's Cuban prisons?
Do you believe it is ok that abortion on demand and partial-birth abortion is funded by taxpayers?
Do you believe it is ok to continue funding liberal media outlets such as NPR and PBS with tax dollars?
Legalizing gay marriages and/or civil unions which will promote further sodomy and its dire consequences is ok with you and the impact it will have on our descendents?
Is it ok to teach students in government run schools that homosexuality is "normal" even though it violates "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God?" (Have you read the Declaration of Independence?)
Do you support ACLU law suits bent on deporting Christ, eliminating all public prayer, disallowing Christmas celebrations, outlawing the Ten Commandments, and redefining the natural family?
Instead of defining morals and values from a faith-based foundation, define them according to whatever the ACLU, Ted Kennedy, Howard Dean, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Robert Reich, Bill Maher, Hollywood Elites, and George Soros dictate as being "politically correct" with no specified boundaries as "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" does?
Is it ok to use selective diversity and selective tolerance in calling faith-based parents bigots for standing firm in defining and defending morality and values as Biblically-based when raising their children?
Does the "Establishment Clause" really mean freedom from religion, and not what the First Amendment actually states, "freedom of religion?"
Do you believe "Separation of Church and State" is a law and not a "Big Lie?"
Do you believe religion is only for Sunday's and not for Catholic politicians? Who is their Lord? And should Catholic Politicians ignore their Lord's appeal to "shine their Light" instead of "hiding it under a bushel?" Shouldn't Catholic politicians also be "the salt of the world." And ignore what Jesus said: "...if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men?" Isn't this in direct opposition to how the Founders called upon the same Lord in establishing this great nation?
Is it ok to indoctrinate our children as "world citizens" and eliminate America's Christian Heritage from history lessons, while using the UN sponsored International Baccalaureate (IB) program which for ages 3 through grade 12 promotes socialism, disarmament, radical environmentalism and moral relativism, while attempting to undermine Christian religious values and national sovereignty?
Are you afraid of school vouchers because government-run schools may collapse because all faith-based parents will remove their children from the secular indoctrination and GLSEN directed lessons?
Are you concerned about the growth in home schooling, especially among faith-based parents for the same reason?
Do you side with the ACLU in their assaults against organizations like the Boy Scouts and Salvation Army? Do you also hope in the name of liberally defined selective diversity and selective tolerance, quoting Scripture when reproving sin, will be outlawed as a "hate crime" leading to arrest and prison?
Do you believe all gun rights, even for law abiding citizens, must be repealed?
Do you believe Labor Union bosses should be able to continue using forced union dues to fund campaigns of liberal candidates and liberal/socialistic causes?
Are you against eliminating taxes that penalizes being married?
Are you against eliminating the inheritance (death) tax, wealth that has already been taxed?
Are you in favor of using the filibuster limiting judicial nominees to only those that will further the transforming of the judicial branch into an extended arm of the liberal dictate.
Are you ok with judicial decisions which are based on international rulings and not the Constitution?
Are you in favor of looking to the corrupt United Nations for permission to defend America's sovereignty and also believe it is in America's best interest to sign any and all UN Treaties regardless if they violate individual and/or property rights?
Are you willing to overlook anything and everything as long as liberals can regain control of the White House and Congress and at ANY cost, including the threat of terrorism?
Do you welcome DNC support and direction from groups such as NARAL, NOW, Planned Parenthood, GLSEN, Labor Union Bosses, Hollywood liberals, George Soros, Michael Moore, Michael Newdow, and Move-On.org?
Do you favor a cradle-to-grave nanny state of socialism with government-run schools, government-run retirement, government-run healthcare, and UN-run "sustainable development" mandates? Do you prefer your life and "liberty" to be controlled and directed according to the Marxist and Hillary ideology of the "common-good?" And you disagree with this Albert Einstein's observation?: "He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would fully suffice." And you also disagree with this Thomas Jefferson's observation?: "Were we directed from Washington when to sow, and when to reap, we should soon want bread." (Hillary's Village or Rick's Family? Is this the real reason liberals are attacking Rick?)
Do you believe you are more compassionate and smarter then conservatives, except when it comes to donating within red and blue states, as revealed from The Catalogue of Philanthropy which ranked the 50 states, adjusting for gross income, on their collective donations to charity? Do you care that the Democrats are offering no plans of their own, except the plan to attack conservatives at every turn?
You have no qualms misusing words such as "tolerance, diversity, safety, hate crimes, and mainstream" in deceiving the public?

Have you decided? If you are a "mainstream American" will you continue to vote for "mainstream Democrats?"

Whether you agree or disagree with any of liberal views, have you let your elected officials know what "mainstream" means to you? http://www.congress.org/congressorg/home/ Otherwise a judge may decide for you.

Back to Wall of Separation? Index