He That Has Ears To Hear, Let Him Hear
 (Matthew 11:15-30)
Challenging both secular wisdom and religious doctrines. - Will our descendants know moral virtue?

Home | About | Search | Newsletter | Contact

Same-Sex Marriage? "Destroy the family, and the society will collapse." --Nikolai Lenin  
- Facts, Consequences, and Resources

Here are a few wisdom challenging questions that need to be addressed.

‘The Grace of God that Brings Salvation’ - by Rob Pue ...In conversations with some of these LGBT allies and professing Christians, we learned that they believe God loves everyone, no matter what. That Jesus does not condemn sodomy or same-sex “marriage,” or even “transgenderism,” but rather, they believe God MADE them that way, and that God Himself gives them the GRACE to live any way they want. ...One of my favorite verses about grace is found in Titus 2. “For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men, teaching us that denying ungodliness and worldy lusts, we should live soberly, righteously and godly in this present age; looking for that blessed hope and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ, Who gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto Himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.”


Same-sex Marriage

Resources for Same-Sex Marriage "Against Nature" LGBT Health Facts
Facts on Sodomy & SSM The High Cost of Aids Republican Unity Coalition
Christian Response to SSM Hope for the Homosexual Addressing "Hate"
Special (unequal) "Rights" Selective Diversity Selective Tolerance
"Hate Crimes" ??? Tim Gill Kevin Jennings

 (September 2013 update: No H8? -- Bombshell Book: Matthew Shepard Tortured, Murdered by Gay Lover)

From the Gay Manifesto

Included below:

Upfront - God's Design

Click here to see how and why marriage "between one man and one woman" is God's favored design.

JESUS ON GENDER AND MARRIAGE - By BRYAN FISCHER - In Matthew 19, Jesus answers our questions about gender. Now as you are aware, Facebook offers its users 51, 56 or 58 different gender choices (depending on who’s counting). Included are options such as “bigender, gender fluid, genderqueer, non-binary, pangender, two-spirit” and the ever-useful “neither.” But Jesus cuts through all this fog and confusion by telling us flatly that there are two and only two genders. “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female…?” (Matthew 19:4). When Jesus asks, “have you never read,” he is referring to Scripture, for he himself is quoting from the book of Genesis. In other words, Jesus’ guide for understanding gender was the word of God. And it should be our guide too. Science corroborates Scripture at every turn on this subject, by the way, for every human being has either male DNA or female DNA from the moment of conception until the end of life. So Christ’s view of gender is not just biblically correct, it is biologically correct.

   Likewise Jesus slices through all the sturm und drang regarding marriage, again by quoting Scripture. “Have you never read that he who created them…said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh?’” (Matthew 19:4-5). It’s impossible to get clearer than that. Marriage is the union of a man (that’s one man) and his wife (that’s one woman). You have the word of Jesus on that. Let’s also not miss that Jesus uses the phrase “from the beginning.” Marriage as a man-woman institution did not evolve and gradually develop over the eons of time and cultural experimentation. It has always been, from the dawn of time, from the first man and first woman in all history, the union of one man and one woman. You can’t “evolve” upward from that; you can only devolve into some lower and inferior and clouded understanding of marriage. Marriage has always been a man-woman institution and will be until the end of time. What God has defined, man may not redefine. Any other kind of “marriage” is a counterfeit, a fake, something bogus, something pretend. It is not and never can be the real thing. Read more at http://barbwire.com/2015/10/07/jesus-on-gender-and-marriage/


It is pleasing to Satan, the Great Deceiver, to see people being duped and capitulate to the Devil's favored artificial imitation of marriage, mocking God's favored design of one mans and one woman.


Should a Christian go to a gay 'wedding'? - By Bryan Fischer - Is a refusal to attend a same-sex wedding of a friend or family member an act of hate? No, on the contrary it is an act of love and genuine compassion. ...Why should a Christian politely decline to attend a homosexual wedding? For exactly the same reason a Christian baker should politely decline to bake a cake for a gay wedding. It sends a message of affirmation for something God has plainly condemned. A wedding is a celebration. Guests are there to rejoice with and congratulate the couple. Their presence represents approval. Approving of homosexual "marriage" in any way, shape or form is one thing no sincerely devoted follower of Christ can do. This is simply because a homosexual "marriage" is based on a sex act the Bible uniformly condemns from beginning to end as immoral, unnatural and unhealthy. Homosexual "marriage" is a sham and a counterfeit. In reality, there is no such thing as a homosexual "marriage," since God has defined marriage from the dawn of time as the union of one man and one woman. Jesus reaffirmed God's definition of marriage with words that came from his own lips during his incarnation.


Gay Marriage Is Satanic - By MATT BARBER - Declared Jesus: "'Haven't you read,' he replied, 'that at the beginning the Creator "made them male and female," and said, "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh"? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate'" (Matt. 19:4-6). Rather conspicuously, and as I've noted before, Jesus did not say: "At the beginning the Creator made them lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT). For this reason a male, female or shemale will leave his, her or whatchahoozie's father and mother, father and father or mother and mother and be united to his or her wife—and/or husband—and the two or more will become one flesh. Not that there's anything wrong with that." Here, and as I've likewise explained, is what marriage is: "Marriage is the God-ordained, lifelong, covenantal union between man and wife, designed to provide men, women and children optimal stability and overall well-being. Marriage is that biologically, spiritually and morally centered institution calculated to ensure responsible procreation and perpetuate the human race. Marriage, real marriage, represents the fundamental cornerstone of any healthy society (any society that hopes to survive, at least). "Here's what marriage is not: "Anything else." And so the notion of "same-sex" marriage is a self-defeating proposition. "Gay marriage" is not marriage at all.

   ...Moreover, the very thing that defines "gay marriage," the biologically and spiritually disordered act of same-sex sodomy, likewise mocks God's design for natural sexual intercourse. The Bible, throughout both the Old and New Testaments, unambiguously condemns as sin rising to the level of "an abomination," all same-sex sexual conduct, be it, "loving, monogamous and committed," or otherwise. Homosexuality is mock sexuality. And "gay marriage" is mock marriage. So, again, and lest there be any uncertainty as to where I'm going with all this, "same-sex marriage" is evil—always and without exception. It is centrally defined by the sin of Sodom, which is expressly wicked conduct. All good things come from God the Father, and all wickedness comes from the father of lies. If God designed biblical marriage and natural human sexuality, and He did, then we are left no doubt as to who designed its counterfeit—as to who fabricated pagan "gay marriage" and otherwise perverted God's perfect purposes for human sexuality. "Gay marriage" is satanic.  


The 'Holiness Code' and Homosexuality - By Ed Vitagliano - How could a homosexual activist possibly evade the condemnation inherent within such a verse? Here are the main arguments made against the biblical teaching of Leviticus – and the answers to them:  (1) This is a part of the ‘Holiness Code’ and no longer applies.  ...Many activists argue that the Levitical condemnation of homosexuality was only meant to keep Israel separate from the surrounding nations – and thus did not reflect God’s universal disapproval of such activity.  “The point is that The Holiness Code of Leviticus prohibits male same-sex acts for religious reasons, not for sexual reasons,” said former Catholic priest Daniel Helminiak in What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality.“The concern is to keep Israel distinct from the Gentiles.”  The problem with this assertion, however, is that God not only held Israel to these standards of sexual conduct but also the surrounding pagan nations. 

   ...(2) The context is idol worship, not committed gay relationships.  ...Ex-gay Joe Dallas, founder of Genesis Counseling and the author of three books on homosexuality, also discounts such arguments. “If the practices in Leviticus 18 and 20 are condemned only because of their association with idolatry,” he said, “then it logically follows they would be permissible if they were committed apart from idolatry. That would mean incest, adultery, bestiality and child sacrifice (all of which are listed in these chapters) are only condemned when associated with idolatry; otherwise, they are allowable. No serious reader of these passages could accept such a premise.” 

   (3) We don’t obey many of the other prohibitions in Leviticus, so why pick on homosexuals? ...The very idea of a preacher belittling God’s warnings against sexual sin is itself abhorrent. And make no mistake – he is belittling God’s holy and just commandments. He is equating eating “a little shrimp in my jambalaya” with the practice of sodomy.  Would he do the same with the other sins in Leviticus? Would he say eating “a little shrimp in my jambalaya” is no different than committing adultery? Incest? Bestiality? ...In passages such as Mark 7:17-23Acts 10:9-16, etc., the New Testament makes clear that the food prohibitions under the Old Covenant have been removed. This is clear even to first-year Bible school students. Why wouldn’t Dunivant know this? One suspects that he does, in fact, know it, but is being disingenuous in order to promote the acceptance of homosexuality.  On the other hand, nowhere in the New Testament have God’s prohibitions against sexual sin – adultery, incest, bestiality, and homosexuality – been repealed.  


How the Left Has Sabotaged Marriage and Family - By Paul Kengor - In response, of course, liberals were jubilant. Their leader, the one who promised to fundamentally transform America, responded by literally illuminating the nation’s house in rainbow colors. Americans saw all of that. They saw the pictures of their fundamentally transformed White House; they saw other culture-transformers dancing in the streets joyously rejecting what a great country once called the laws of nature and nature’s God.

   ...Communist Party USA and its publication, People’s World—successor to the Soviet-funded and directed Daily Worker—were thrilled with what Anthony Kennedy and friends had done. For communists, this was a stunning victory, the securing of a long-elusive effort to vanquish the fixed marriage model set forth long ago by nature and the Creator. Indeed, if you thought the White House seemed eager to hoist the rainbow colors, you should have seen the American Communist Party.  ...For communists, two centuries ago and still today, that requisite anti-religious secularism has been there all along. Much of the wider American culture, outside of the far left, has also become secular and dismissive of traditional religious teaching on matters like family and marriage.  

   ...They may all come to the “marriage equality” position from entirely different motivations, and otherwise hold little in common ideologically, but they all share one crucial component: Each of them rejects the idea that there is a single, absolute, eternal standard for male-female marriage ordained by nature and nature’s God, and each believes that he can render unto himself the right to abolish any such standard and create his own definitions.

   As for communists, they couldn’t care less whatever tags or hashtags or slogans or colors the majority culture uses to redefine marriage and family. To them, the larger objective remains the same: to reject and abolish a traditional Judeo-Christian understanding of marriage and family. They are getting what they’ve long wanted, and they could not have done it without the support of mainstream Americans. The radical left could never have achieved this ultimate takedown of marriage without the larger public’s acquiescence and assistance. The wider same-sex-marriage-supporting public has been the indispensable handmaiden to the radical left’s ability to at long last alter marriage and family. It has been quite a coup.   

Open Letter to Supreme Court: We Obey God, Not Men - CBNNews.com - Some leading religious conservatives say they won't go along with a Supreme Court ruling that would force them to violate what they call a "biblical understanding of marriage" as the union of a man and a woman. Their open letter to the Supreme Court was published as a full-page ad in Wednesday's Washington Post. The ad said that "any judicial opinion which purports to redefine marriage will constitute an unjust law." More than 60 people signed it, including Franklin Graham, Dr. James Dobson, Hispanic evangelical leader Samuel Rodriguez, and Rev. Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. They concluded by quoting the Bible, saying, "We must obey God rather than men." (Read the letter here: http://drjamesdobson.org/docs/default-source/special/washington-post-adfinal.pdf?sfvrsn=2. The complete Marriage Pledge can be read in its entirety at http://www.defendmarriage.org.)

Would Jesus Officiate At A Homosexual Marriage? - By Coach Dave Daubenmire - The devil’s kids are highly skilled masters of confusion. In fact, the Scriptures tell us that Satan is “the author of confusion.” He doesn’t just practice and spread confusion; he is the one who comes up with the evil, crazy ideas. It’s the same trick he used with Eve. All the devil did was question the authority of God, and that tiny seed of doubt he planted in the heart of Eve has led us to where we are today. “Did God REALLY say…?” That was the confusion and doubt that Satan planted in the heart of Eve. The question “Did God REALLY say homosexuals cannot be married?” is the fiery dart that the enemy is using today. But the devil never answers the questions that he asks—he merely plants the seeds of doubt. Doubt leads to confusion, confusion makes you disoriented, and disorientation causes one to get off track.
   ...Jesus speaks the truth (actually, He IS The Truth), and the devil always questions the truth. Satan never forces you to agree with him; he merely dangles the apple and invites you to take a bite. What has happened in the marriage debate is nothing short of the age-old “bait and switch.” You see, today the enemies of God are doing everything they can to get us to question God, His authority, His positions, and His nature. It’s the same trick that was used in the garden. The Bible tells us that there is “nothing new under the sun.” This spreading of confusion has always been one of Satan’s most effective weapons. 
   ...Didn’t Jesus eat with sinners? Didn’t Jesus say that it was the sick that needed a physician? Didn’t Jesus forgive the woman at the well? Didn’t Jesus say to love our neighbor? Would Jesus reject and discriminate against homosexuals? WWJD?” In all honesty, however, the real question we should be asking is: “Would Jesus Unite Two Men in Marriage?” I believe the answer is very clear. If Jesus wouldn’t “marry” two men, why should any of his followers? Love homosexuals? Yes! Marry them? No way! WWJD?
   ...Let’s go ahead and clear up a few things—marriage was the idea of Jesus’ Father. He is the one who defined it as a union between one man and one woman. Jesus told us that He came to fulfill the law, not do away with it. (Remember, I’m speaking to Christians here.) Can you tell me of one time in the entirety of the Scriptures when Jesus ever contradicted a position that His Daddy held? But we’re confused. We want to change the institution of marriage so as not to appear “hateful” or “bigoted” or “intolerant” or “unloving” or “discriminatory” because, as they tell us, Jesus wasn’t any of those things.
   Don’t you see the bait and switch? Elena Kagen, Ruth Ginsburg, and their gang of God-haters are not deciding on the nature of Jesus or the proper treatment of our fellow man. They are deciding whether or not the institution of marriage should be redefined. Did God REALLY say…? Does God change His mind? Does Jesus have the power to override the authority and laws of His Father? Was God a “conservative” and Jesus a “liberal?”
   Jesus said “My Father and I are one and the same.” “Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and forever.” The question is not whether God loves everybody. It is not whether or not we have the right to marry the one we love. It is not whether or not Christians are “to judge.” The question is: are Christians supposed to reflect the very nature of God? If you ask the wrong question, you are sure to get the wrong answer. Answer this question and let all of the confusion fade away. Would Jesus officiate a homosexual marriage?  

Samuel Adams, 1794 - “In the supposed state of nature, all men are equally bound by the laws of nature, or to speak more properly, the laws of the Creator; — They are imprinted by the finger of God on the heart of man. Thou shall do no injury to thy neighbor, is the voice of nature and reason, and it is confirmed by written revelation.”

PURPOSES OF MARRIAGE: SAME-SEX ‘MARRIAGE’ STRIKES OUT - By BRYAN FISCHER - We stand as a culture at a critical point in our understanding and definition of marriage. With out-of-control tyrants wearing black robes substituting their fevered imaginations for the express will of the people in state after state, our nation is being engulfed with a tsunami of wrong-headed and societally fatal decisions regarding marriage. We cannot even begin to evaluate the public policy implications of same-sex “marriage” until we first understand the purpose and design of marriage as an institution. As I have written before, according to the laws of nature and nature’s God, there are three purposes for marriage: companionship, sex and procreation. Same-sex “marriage” does not, indeed cannot, fulfill even a single one of these three purposes.

o What a Diner Did for Customers Who Prayed in Public Wasn’t Only Tolerant, It Was Downright Generous - By Nicole - Mary Haglund, owner of Mary’s Gourmet Diner in North Carolina, does something unique and very unexpected for people she catches praying in public at her restaurant: she gives them a 15% discount.
   WARNING: Rear nudity, offensive photos and graphic descriptions; as always, AFTAH will block frontal nudity but we will publish photos with rear nudity. Our goal is to convey the “gay” Mecca’s radicalism and perverseness as realistically as possible without being pornographic. (Click link for disturbing photos.)
    “They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy.” (Romans 1: 29-31; NIV)
   SAN FRANCISCO, POST-”NUDITY BAN”: San Francisco adopted a “public nudity” ban in 2012. However, it exempted annual nudist events and homosexual-oriented street fairs like the “Up Your Alley” held in the city Sunday. The event drew thousands and featured hundreds upon hundreds of men (and some women) in various states of undress, including full frontal nudity. “Up Your Alley” also promoted condom-less “barebacking” sodomy (condemned by the CDC) despite the presence of AIDS groups; and celebrated human degradation (“slaves”); and consensual violence, e.g., whipping people to the point of bleeding as an S&M ritual (see photos below). All Photos: Americans For Truth, Peter LaBarbera. Fair use allowed as long as “AFTAH.org” is credited. Click on photos to enlarge or view in a separate window.
   ...I was curious to see what out-and-proud San Francisco was like AFTER the city council passed its 2012 “public nudity ban”–which, curiously enough, exempts massive street fairs celebrating nudity and perversion. (This is San Francisco, after all.) So I ventured out to the world’s most sexually deviant city last weekend (Sunday, July 27) to cover its annual “Up Your Alley” street fair, also called “Dore Alley“–put on by the same proud perverts (er…sadomasochistic “leathermen”) that annually stage the notorious Folsom Street Fair.
   Organizers of the “Up Your Alley” fair call it “Folsom’s Dirty Little Brother,” which, considering Folsom’s unbridled debauchery, is quite a recommendation for boundary-defying libertines and tourist gawkers who are there for the freak show. [See previous AFTAH stories on Folsom HERE (2007)HERE (2008) and HERE (2009).]
   Below is the first installment of a several-part photo-story on the twisted event and the bizarre ethos of San Francisco; the next installment will document the fair’s promotion of “barebacking” (anal sex without a condom)–thus violating the CDC’s longtime, basic recommendation for HIV prevention to “men who have sex with men”: always use a condom.
   ...I was curious to see what out-and-proud San Francisco was like AFTER the city council passed its 2012 “public nudity ban”–which, curiously enough, exempts massive street fairs celebrating nudity and perversion. (This is San Francisco, after all.) So I ventured out to the world’s most sexually deviant city last weekend (Sunday, July 27) to cover its annual “Up Your Alley” street fair, also called “Dore Alley“–put on by the same proud perverts (er…sadomasochistic “leathermen”) that annually stage the notorious Folsom Street Fair. Organizers of the “Up Your Alley” fair call it “Folsom’s Dirty Little Brother,” which, considering Folsom’s unbridled debauchery, is quite a recommendation for boundary-defying libertines and tourist gawkers who are there for the freak show. [See previous AFTAH stories on Folsom HERE (2007)HERE (2008) and HERE (2009).] Below is the first installment of a several-part photo-story on the twisted event and the bizarre ethos of San Francisco; the next installment will document the fair’s promotion of “barebacking” (anal sex without a condom)–thus violating the CDC’s longtime, basic recommendation for HIV prevention to “men who have sex with men”: always use a condom.
   ...As always at such “leather” festivals, there were scenes of whipping for the purpose of sexual gratification–i.e., consensual sexual violence. Normal, healthy society tries to alleviate pain, heal wounds, and lift the human spirit. Disordered, sadistic/masochistic “sexuality” inflicts pain, intentionally causes wounds, and celebrates human degradation.  


Back to "Wall of Separation?" Index

Revealing the gay agenda

o Gay Agenda Being Pushed into Public Schools - By Dave Jolly - I know you’ve heard of library books in the public schools that promote the homosexual lifestyle for kids as young as kindergarten, but are you aware of the agenda to force more homosexual and perverse lifestyles on your kids? Have you ever heard of a group called GLSEN? It stands for ‘Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network.’ However, don’t let the word ‘straight’ fool you, they are anything but straight. They are the largest LGBT activist organization in America that is working to push their agenda into the public schools and government.
   ...Last month, GLSEN Massachusetts held their annual conference in Boston where they hoped to introduce teachers, students and other homosexual activists to their liberal and perverted agenda. On their website, they state the purpose of the conference as: “The conference is an opportunity for more than 250 students, educators, parents, and school staff to spend a day building community and sharing resources for creating safer, more affirming schools for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Questioning (LGBTQ) youth, educators, and allies.”
   In all of this, where does it say anything about the ‘straight’ agenda? The only place it appears is in their name, not in their actions. Brian Camenker, Founder and President of MassResistance has been working for nearly 20 years trying to stop the gay agenda of working its way into the Massachusetts public schools. He commented about the Boston conferencesaying: “They want kids to feel comfortable around homosexuality and those issues, feel comfortable coming out, feel comfortable taking on those behaviors, feeling comfortable with everything about it.” ...“You wouldn’t think you could integrate homosexuality into much, but they do by saying something like “a woman does this and her wife does this. They will bring in homosexual themed books. One of their favorites is to claim that historical figures – Eleanor Roosevelt, for example – were actually homosexual.”
    If you want to get an idea of just what GLSEN’s agenda is, I strongly urge you to visit the MassResistance website which describes what took place at the Boston conference, who the speakers were and what workshops they held to push their abominable agenda. This isn’t just happening in Massachusetts, but in every state of the country. GLSEN is working with state and federal legislatures, the Department of Education and school districts everywhere pushing to get their agenda into your kids’ education and they are succeeding. This is another reason why parents should do whatever they can to keep their kids away from the public school system which currently is teaching nothing Christian, wholesome, moral or virtuous. A nation can be lost in one generation and we are losing America now. The future depends upon what your kids are being taught now.

Mike Huckabee - Remember when gay activists argued that it was silly for religious people to oppose same-sex marriage because it would never even affect them? Since then, we’ve seen religious wedding suppliers successfully sued for turning down jobs for same-sex weddings. But here’s a new twist. Jack Phillips owns Masterpiece Cakes in Lakewood, Colorado. He’s a devout Christian, and he turned down a request to make a gay wedding cake. Even though there are nearly 20 other bakeries in town, the gay couple got the ACLU involved and sued Jack. Friday, the Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruled that he violated the state’s Anti-Discrimination Act, and that trumps his First Amendment right to freedom of religion. This might not even be news anymore, except for one thing: same sex weddings aren’t legal in Colorado. Only civil unions. In other words, the state commissioners ruled that Jack violated state law by refusing to participate in an activity that’s illegal under state law. I think this may finally answer the question, “Just how much pot are they smoking in Colorado these days?”

Maybe He's Not Gay: Another View on Homosexuality - New Book by Linda Harvey Especially for youth! We are pleased to announce a brand new book by Linda Harvey, especially for youth. "How many books exist for teens about homosexuality? About the deception of the culture and the hope for every young person?" said Linda Harvey, president of Mission America. ...As more and more young people announce, "I'm gay," it's time to take a closer look. It's a profound declaration, a new civil right (they are told) and it's "who you are." But there's a problem. This is not anything close to the truth, and kids deserve the whole story.

Wake up, and smell truth By Michael Glatze - Christians are losing the "culture war" discourse about gay marriage, because they are avoiding the topic at hand: homosexuality. Recently, I saw a quote by Ryan Anderson, of the Heritage Foundation: "The marriage debate is not about homosexuality, but about marriage." The rest of the comments by Mr. Anderson went to great lengths to explain to gay people that we don't want to deprive you of companionship; we (Christians, presumably) just want to sanction the Godly form of marriage. Let's backpedal a second, here. The point is not marriage. Marriage didn't need a defense, before homosexuality become increasingly accepted in American society. Marriage would not currently need a debate, were it not for the rampant acceptance (and, blindness about) homosexuality. The issue is not marriage; the issue very clearly is homosexuality.
   When God took care of Sodom and Gomorrah, he didn't send the two angels down to have a calm, nice dialogue with the men of the city, who were rampantly engaging in homosexuality, explaining to them, "it's not that we have a problem with your lifestyle, guys... please, feel free to hang out in each other's company... we wouldn't want to deprive you of companionship...," etc. No; the angels came to deliver out Lot and his family, before the judgment of the Lord on a wicked city, whose inhabitants had turned from His gracious hand. God is not compromising with homosexuality; how come so many "evangelicals" are? I think I know the answer: American "evangelicals," largely, are interested in what they can "get away with," in the culture war. Thus, bogus Declarations like the Manhattan Declaration which was put forth a few years back, COMPLETELY AVOID THE PIVOTAL ISSUE OF HOMOSEXUALITY!  

Natalie N Johnson I happen to be a Black woman who was delivered of homosexuality, and because I am (Praise God), many homosexuals believe that I was suppose to somehow understand their so called struggle better than anyone else. I can't tell you how many times homosexuals would write to me saying, "Well, YOUR PEOPLE were denied civil rights before' or 'you should know better than to be against us' in so many words. 
   The LGBTs fail to understand that Black History is not about folks who wanted to sodomize each other and confuse the daylights out of people with their gender problems. Blacks fought for the right to be treated as humans, the right to work, the right to be free from harsh labor, etc. Homosexuality is a sin, and last time I checked, anybody can commit that sin no matter the race. Granted that some homosexuals are mistreated, but to compare their struggles to what my people had to endure in the past simply does not come close.
   Will the homosexuals ever understand that Black History is not equal to their perverted struggle for absolute perversion? Some might, and some will not. Keep me in prayer as I continue to contend with these spirits.  

Civil Rights leader Pastor Fred Shuttlesworth, marched with Dr. Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy. They were called The Big Three in the fight for Civil Rights. When the attempt was made to repeal the City Charter language, Pastor Shuttlesworth opposed the change. CCV asked Pastor Fred Shuttlesworth to respond to the claims of homosexual activists who said they were being discriminated against. Be sure to click here to hear what the expert on discrimination had to say about discrimination. ("I fought my whole life for equal rights, not special rights.") Click here to read more.

Same-Sex “Marriage” – Apples, Oranges & Oxymorons By Cheryl Pass - The legal standing of natural law is what is being shredded in the instance of homosexual “marriage.” Natural law is the basis for Jefferson’s assertions in the Declaration of Independence. “Nature has written her moral laws on the head and heart of every rational and honest man, where man may read them for himself. If ever you are about to say anything amiss, or to do anything wrong, consider beforehand you will feel something within you which will tell you it is wrong, and ought not to be said or done. This is your conscience, and be sure and obey it… Conscience is the only sure clue which will eternally guide a man clear of all his doubts and inconsistencies.” Thomas Jefferson
     Again, I would rather not be having this discussion. It’s ridiculous on its face, and greatly damaging in all aspects to our society. The socialists in our government have been trying to rid our nation of our common natural law since the Progressive movement started over 100 years ago. This is but one more evidence of that. Gay marriage is not a right that can be given by a socialist government. Our rights don’t come from government. It is nothing more than another tool to take down our natural rights as given by Our Creator as stated by Jefferson in the Declaration. But even if you don’t subscribe to that substantiation, you can see there are many other considerations making gay marriage a very bad idea.  

World Congress of Families Hails Victory for Natural Marriage in Australian Parliament (House of Representatives and Senate) (9/21/2012) What was supposed to be a historic advance for "same-sex marriage" turned into an ignominous defeat and a victory for marriage and the natural family, when the lower house of the Australian parliament voted overwhelmingly against a gay-marriage bill by a vote of 98 to 42 on September 19th in Canberra.  Then on September 20th, a similar bill was defeated in the Senate by 41 votes to 26. This means that there will be no change to the definition of natural marriage in Australia.  

...Earlier this year thousands of pro-family leaders gathered to affirm natural marriage in The Madrid Declaration of World Congress of Families VI (May 25-27, 2012), unanimously adopted by more than 3,200 delegates from 72 nations.  The Declaration provides in part:  "We affirm the natural family to be the union of a man and a woman through marriage for the purposes of sharing love and joy, propagating children, providing their moral education, building a vital home economy, offering security in times of trouble, and binding the generations." "We affirm that the natural family is a fixed aspect of the created order, one ingrained in human nature.  The natural family cannot change into some new shape; nor can it be re-defined by eager social engineers." "We affirm that the natural family is the ideal, optimal, true family system.  While we acknowledge varied living situations, all other 'family forms' are incomplete or are mere fabrications of the state."  

FAMILY rooted in DIVINE NATURE," By Randall Murphree (OneNewsNow) - For example take the hotly contested debate on marriage. In the politically correct circles of Washington, D.C., and other liberal strongholds across the nation, traditional marriage is passe, perhaps even antithetical to an enlightened populace. Subsequently, the traditional family, too, is no longer a virtue to be revered, but rather a dying relic of a self-proclaimed progressive people. Dr. Dennis Kinlaw believes that if our nation is to survive, the battle line in our day is to preserve the pre-eminence of marriage and family. “I am at the point where I think this issue is the central one,” he said. He suggests that in the broad political sense, the body of Christ must stand for some sacred things because with the current administration in the White House, we are into “total paganism,” and the family continues to be dismantled. “This is one place where the difference between Christianity and the options becomes crystal clear,” he said. “The Christian church has to recognize it is a minority. We’re back in the same position we were in during the second century AD.”     

Kinlaw says the concept of family is rooted not in sociology – as secularists might have us believe – but in the divine nature of God. The evidence is that the Trinity itself includes a familial relationship, Father and Son. “Everything hinges on the family,” he said. “There’s no discussion of law in Genesis; it’s all family. You get the law in Exodus, when Israel becomes a nation.” Furthermore, Kinlaw interprets God’s words “I brought you to Myself” in Exodus as a nuptial covenant, not a legal covenant. Thus, rooted in the earliest history of God’s people are marriage and family – the two institutions God uses to teach us who He is and who we are. Regarding the activist homosexual agenda, Kinlaw offers an interesting insight, as it impacts society’s determination to redefine the Judeo-Christian concept of marriage and family. “We lost [the battle] on homosexuality when we made it a moral thing,” he said. “I don’t think we can win it politically because everyone has his own view of law.”

American Psychological Association Fraud: Hooker Study Did Not Prove Homosexuals Are Normal  Dr. Paul Cameron, Family Research Institute -  American psychiatry says it categorizes mental disorders based on scientific facts -- not political pressure. Those promoting homosexuality as normal cite the fact that professional associations no longer consider homosexuals disordered. A new examination of the study that 'changed psychiatric minds' about homosexuality reveals such sloppiness that the scientific method had to have been ignored in favor of political correctness. Psychiatry's junior partner -- the American Psychological Association [APA] -- sold psychiatrists a bill of goods when it claimed the Hooker study was 'definitive' proof that homosexuals were normal.  
   ..."This may be the first fraud committed by a scientific organization. As the Hooker study is so central to the 'homosexuals are normal' argument, its exposure reopens the question of whether homosexuals are mentally disturbed," said Dr. Paul Cameron, one of the study's authors. "The American Psychiatric Association defines a mental disorder as 'associated with...a significantly increased risk of suffering death, pain, [or] disability....' Given that homosexuals are at significantly greater risk of suffering mental and physical diseases -- and this apparently leads to their shortened average lifespan -- homosexuality would appear to qualify as a mental disorder."
Questions & Answers for Kids about Homosexuality -- New online flyer from Mission America Have you wished you could find a simple flyer for your older grade school or middle school children about homosexuality? Well, Mission America has developed one. It's clear, concise and provides a beginning basis for a more in-depth study as children mature. You can read and download it at the link below. Feel free to print this as needed and give to your children, grandchildren, or your church group.  

The Real Agenda Behind Gay Anti-Bullying Clubs In Your School By Peter Baklinski - In the early 90’s Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered (GLBT) activists in Massachusetts sought to indoctrinate school children with homosexual values. GLBT activist Kevin Jennings, who was later appointed by President Obama as the assistant deputy secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools inside the Department of Education, masterminded the scheme of gay anti-bullying programs as a perfect inroad into the otherwise resistant classrooms of the nation. “If the Radical Right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose,” warned Jennings in a 1995 speech to fellow GLBT activists outlining his strategy. “Their language–‘promoting homosexuality’–is laced with subtle and not-so-subtle innuendo that we are ‘after their kids.’”

Jennings argued that the key to success lay in “framing” the issue in another way, to the advantage of the GLBT cause. The strategy consists in linking the GLBT cause to “universal values” that everyone in the community has in common, such as “safety.” One then builds on this universal value the idea that “homophobia” represents a “threat” to students’ safety since it creates a “climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common.” From this point, one simply promotes legislation and programs for schools that frames the GLBT agenda in the language of these universal values. “This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedalling from day one,” boasted Jennings. “[N]o one could speak up against our frame and say, ‘Why, yes, I do think students should kill themselves:’ This allowed us to set the terms for debate.” (For a fuller description please see the special report on Jennings by Mass Resistance. )

The Top Ten Myths about Homosexuality by Peter Sprigg, Family Research Council - The homosexual activist movement is now over forty years old. Conservatives sometimes refer to the array of goals this movement has pursued—hate crime laws, employment “non-discrimination” laws, same-sex “marriage,” etc.—as “the homosexual agenda.”... They want us to believe that their homosexual “orientation” is something they are born with, cannot choose whether to accept or reject, and cannot change; and that it does no harm (to themselves or to society), while being protected by the principles of the Constitution. However, these are empirical questions, subject to being verified or refuted based on the evidence. And the evidence produced by research has simply not been kind to this theoretical underpinning of the homosexual movement.

iMAPP policy brief by William C. Duncan concludes the majority of courts, as well as the majority of Americans, have rejected the idea that same-sex marriage is a right. Click link for a summary of court decisions over the last decade.

Gay Activists Will Not Stop at Civil Unions The ACLU reveals the true agenda.

One cigarette can kill you; so can one act of gay sex Bryan Fischer - Here's an idea: since gay sex is more dangerous to human health than cigarette smoking, let's make sure our public policies on both are the same. I will be content at this juncture in American history for our public policy on homosexual conduct to be the same as our public policy on cigarette smoking, and for the same reason: the hazard they pose to public health. The goal of the surgeon general's office, since it can't make smoking illegal, is to reduce the smoking rate from its current 20 percent to 12 percent by 2020. We currently have between two and four percent of the population engaging in gay sex. How about we ask the surgeon general to launch a crusade to reduce the gay sex rate from four percent to one percent by 2020?

How 'gay rights' is being sold to America This is the first chapter from David Kupelian's book, "The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom." He's the Managing Editor of wnd.com. This is really important information to know in order to understand what we've been seeing recently.

Homosexuality is completely contrary to the natural order and therefore contrary to the family. Plinio Corr' de Oliveira

If the evil one wants to undermine God, he must attack God's favored design of marriage between one man and one woman and subsequently God's design for family which is the foundation for a civil society?

Nature's violators continue to confirm the Word of God....Prime examples Tim Gill and Kevin Jennings

Challenging questions for the "reprobate mind"

Here are questions that need to be addressed. What is the foundation for how boundaries are to be established? What new and improved wisdom do secular humanists use to justify violating "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God," which was the foundation laid out in America's Founding Document on how "unalienable Rights" were to be "entitled?" What is the “progressive” foundation? How do secular humanists determine the rules and boundaries if not by “the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God?” What is the basis that secular humanists use for determining laws and “Rights?“ How do progressive justify "entitling" a "Right" for same-sex relationships?
A marriage made in heaven or a marriage made in courts. What happens when "We the people" are allowed to vote? Do you favor God's Marriage between one man and one woman or that of a despotic Judge? God's design, or Satan's attempt to thwart God's design? Traditional family or destroy that basic premise of a "civil" society? Nikolai Lenin knew it: "Destroy the family, and the society will collapse."

Martin Luther King Jr. - Excerpts from his Letter from the Birmingham Jail April 16, 1963  "How does one determine whether a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law."
Note: There is no justification in equating slavery or racial discrimination with marriage. The two are totally different issues. The abolition of slavery upheld "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." Allowing same-sex marriage violates God's favored, "natural" design.
Isaiah 5:20 - "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"

MLK on Just and Unjust Laws (Youtube) - Published on Jan 20, 2014 Martin Luther King's famous "Meet the Press" interview highlighting the classic distinction between just and unjust laws and our obligations regarding them. Always timely and relevant points in a constitutional society.

MLK: homosexuality a 'problem' with a 'solution' By J. Matt Barber - This past week America honored both the life and noble work of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., a Bible-believing Christian minister who did more to advance the cause of race-based civil rights than perhaps any other person in recent history. Regrettably – and as they do each year – the same flock of opportunist "LGBT"-activist vultures quickly swooped in, picking the live flesh from MLK's character-based "dream," to advance their own behavior-based nightmare. In what amounts to a sort of soft racism, this mostly white left-wing faction has, over the years, disingenuously and ignobly hitched its little pink wagon to a civil rights movement that, by contrast, is built upon the genuine and noble precepts of racial equality and humanitarian justice.
   What was MLK's position on the homosexual lifestyle and so-called "gay rights"? While he said little in public on the issue, what he did say made his viewpoint abundantly clear. Unlike the "LGBT" lobby, I'll let Dr. King speak for himself. In 1958, while writing an advice column for Ebony Magazine, Dr. King responded to a young "gay" man looking for guidance. To avoid being accused of "cherry-picking," here is the exchange in its entirety:
   Question: My problem is different from the ones most people have. I am a boy, but I feel about boys the way I ought to feel about girls. I don't want my parents to know about me. What can I do? Is there any place where I can go for help?
   Answer: Your problem is not at all an uncommon one. However, it does require careful attention. The type of feeling that you have toward boys is probably not an innate tendency, but something that has been culturally acquired. Your reasons for adopting this habit have now been consciously suppressed or unconsciously repressed. Therefore, it is necessary to deal with this problem by getting back to some of the experiences and circumstances that led to the habit. In order to do this I would suggest that you see a good psychiatrist who can assist you in bringing to the forefront of conscience all of those experiences and circumstances that led to the habit. You are already on the right road toward a solution, since you honestly recognize the problem and have a desire to solve it.
No amount of leftist spin can muddy Dr. King's lucid position on the homosexual lifestyle. He recognized it as a "culturally acquired" "problem" in need of a "solution" – a "habit" stemming from a series of negative "experiences and circumstances."
   ...Indeed, were he still alive today, and when judged against today's empty, politically correct standards, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. – quite literally the "King" of civil rights – would be perpetually smeared as a "bigot," "hater" and "homophobe" by the ever-"tolerant" left. ...And in 2012, Alveda publicly chastised the NAACP for abandoning its founders and constituents, saying, "Neither my great-grandfather, an NAACP founder, my grandfather Dr. Martin Luther King Sr., an NAACP leader, my father, Rev. A. D. Williams King, nor my uncle Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. embraced the homosexual agenda that the current NAACP is attempting to label as a civil rights agenda. ..."  

FIVE QUESTIONS FOR CHRISTIANS WHO BELIEVE THE BIBLE SUPPORTS GAY MARRIAGE - By Kevin DeYoung - So you’ve become convinced that the Bible supports gay marriage. You’ve studied the issue, read some books, looked at the relevant Bible passages and concluded that Scripture does not prohibit same-sex intercourse so long as it takes place in the context of a loving, monogamous, lifelong covenanted relationship. You still love Jesus. You still believe the Bible. In fact, you would argue that it’s because you love Jesus andbecause you believe the Bible that you now embrace gay marriage as a God-sanctioned good.
   As far as you are concerned, you haven’t rejected your evangelical faith. You haven’t turned your back on God. You haven’t become a moral relativist. You’ve never suggested anything goes when it comes to sexual behavior. In most things, you tend to be quite conservative. You affirm the family, and you believe in the permanence of marriage. But now you’ve simply come to the conclusion that two men or two women should be able to enter into the institution of marriage–both as a legal right and as a biblically faithful expression of one’s sexuality. Setting aside the issue of biblical interpretation for the moment, let me ask five questions.
   1. On what basis do you still insist that marriage must be monogamous? Presumably, you do not see any normative significance in God creating the first human pair male and female (Gen. 2:23-25Matt. 19:4-6). Paul’s language about each man having his own wife and each woman her own husband cannot be taken too literally without falling back into the exclusivity of heterosexual marriage (1 Cor. 7:2). The two coming together as one so they might produce godly offspring doesn’t work with gay marriage either (Mal. 2:15). So why monogamy? Jesus never spoke explicitly against polygamy. The New Testament writers only knew of exploitative polygamy, the kind tied to conquest, greed, and subjugation. If they had known of voluntary, committed, loving polyamorous relationships, who’s to think they wouldn’t have approved?
   These aren’t merely rhetorical questions. The issue is legitimate: if 3 or 13 or 30 people really love each other, why shouldn’t they have a right to be married? And for that matter, why not a brother and a sister, or two sisters, or a mother and son, or father and son, or any other combination of two or more persons who love each other. Once we’ve accepted the logic that for love to be validated it must be expressed sexually and that those engaged in consensual sexual activity cannot be denied the “right” of marriage, we have opened a Pandora’s box of marital permutations that cannot be shut.
   2. Will you maintain the same biblical sexual ethic in the church now that you think the church should solemnize gay marriages? After assailing the conservative church for ignoring the issue of divorce, will you exercise church discipline when gay marriages fall apart? Will you preach abstinence before marriage for all single persons, no matter their orientation? If nothing has really changed except that you now understand the Bible to be approving of same-sex intercourse in committed lifelong relationships,we should expect loud voices in the near future denouncing the infidelity rampant in homosexual relationships. Surely, those who support gay marriage out of “evangelical” principles, will be quick to find fault with the notion that the male-male marriages most likely to survive are those with a flexible understanding that other partners may come and go. According to one study researched and written by two homosexual authors, of 156 homosexual couples studied, only seven had maintained sexual fidelity, and of the hundred that had been together for more than five years, none had remained faithful (cited by Satinover, 55). In the rush to support committed, lifelong, monogamous same-sex relationships, it’s worth asking whether those supporters–especially the Christians among them–will, in fact, insist on a lifelong, monogamous commitment.
   3. Are you prepared to say moms and dads are interchangeable? It is a safe assumption that those in favor of gay marriage are likely to support gay and lesbian couples adopting children or giving birth to children through artificial insemination. What is sanctioned, therefore, is a family unit where children grow up de facto without one birth parent. This means not simply that some children, through the unfortunate circumstances of life, may grow up with a mom and dad, but that the church will positively bless and encourage the family type that will deprive children of either a mother or a father. So are mothers indispensable? Is another dad the same as a mom? No matter how many decent, capable homosexual couples we may know, are we confident that as a general rule there is nothing significant to be gained by growing up with a mother and a father?
   4. What will you say about anal intercourse? The answer is probably “nothing.” But if you feel strongly about the dangers of tobacco or fuss over the negative affects of carbs, cholesterol, gmo’s, sugar, gluten, trans fats, and hydrogenated soybean oil may have on your health, how can you not speak out about the serious risks associated with male-male intercourse. How is it loving to celebrate what we know to be a singularly unhealthy lifestyle? According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, the risk of anal cancer increases 4000 percent among those who engage in anal intercourse. Anal sex increases the risk of a long list of health problems, including “rectal prolapse, perforation that can go septic, chlamydia, cyrptosporidosis, giardiasis, genital herpes, genital warts, isosporiasis, microsporidiosis, gonorrhea, viral hepatitis B and C, and syphilis” (quoted in Reilly, 55). And this is to say nothing of the higher rates of HIV and other health concerns with disproportionate affects on the homosexual community.
   5. How have all Christians at all times and in all places interpreted the Bible so wrongly for so long? Christians misread their Bibles all the time. The church must always be reformed according to the word of God. Sometimes biblical truth rests with a small minority. Sometimes the truth is buried in relative obscurity for generations. But when we must believe that the Bible has been misunderstood by virtually every Christian in every part of the world for the last two thousand years, it ought to give us pause. From the Jewish world in the Old and New Testaments to the early church to the Middle Ages to the Reformation and into the 20th century, the church has understood the Bible to teach that engaging in homosexuality activity was among the worst sins a person could commit. As the late Louis Crompton, a gay man and pioneer in queer studies, explained:
   Some interpreters, seeking to mitigate Paul’s harshness, have read the passage [in Romans 1] as condemning not homosexuals generally but only heterosexual men and women who experimented with homosexuality. According to this interpretation, Paul’s words were not directed at “bona fide” homosexuals in committed relationships. But such a reading, however well-intentioned, seems strained and unhistorical. Nowhere does Paul or any other Jewish writer of this period imply the least acceptance of same-sex relations under any circumstances. The idea that homosexuals might be redeemed by mutual devotion would have been wholly foreign to Paul or any Jew or early Christian. (Homosexuality and Civilization, 114).
   The church has been of one mind on this issue for nearly two millennia. Are you prepared to jeopardize the catholicity of the church and convince yourself that everyone misunderstood the Bible until the 1960s? On such a critical matter, it’s important we think through the implications of our position, especially if it means consigning to the bin of bigotry almost every Christian who has ever lived.

Identical Twin Studies Prove Homosexuality is Not Genetic (Dr. Neil Whitehead) Identical twins have the same genes or DNA. They are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions. If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is gay, the co-twin should also be gay. “Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,” Dr. Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.” Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.”

"Civil" Rights based on race vs. same-sex argument: Read the first two paragraphs of Americas Founding Document, the Declaration of Independence. "Civil" Rights based on race DOES NOT violate "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." Civil Rights based on same-sex DOES.

The Founders on Homosexuality by Dave Miller, Ph.D. - Of those living today in America who were alive 50 years ago, few could have imagined, let alone predicted, that homosexuality would encroach on our culture as it has. In fact, it would have been unthinkable. The rapidity with which homosexual activists continue successfully to bully the nation to normalize what once was universally considered abnormal is astonishing. And toleration has not satisfied them. Allowing their views to be taught in public schools has not appeased them. No, they insist that societal endorsement extend to redefining marriage to include same-sex couples.

...The Founding Fathers of these United States would be incredulous, incensed, and outraged. They understood that acceptance of homosexuality would undermine and erode the moral foundations of civilization. Sodomy, the longtime historical term for same-sex relations, was a capital crime under British common law. Sir William Blackstone, British attorney, jurist, law professor, and political philosopher, authored his monumental Commentaries on the Laws of England from 1765-1769. These commentaries became the premiere legal source admired and used by America's Founding Fathers.

...How many Americans realize that while serving as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War, the Father of our country was apprised of a homosexual in the army. The response of General Washington was immediate and decisive. He issued "General Orders" from Army Headquarters at Valley Forge on Saturday, March 14, 1778 (Search with quotes "George Washington, March 14, 1778, General Orders" at http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/): Or (The writings of George Washington from the original manuscript ..., Volume 11, page 83)

At a General Court Martial whereof Colo. Tupper was President (10th March 1778) Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom's Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier; Secondly, For Perjury in swearing to false Accounts, found guilty of the charges exhibited against him, being breaches of 5th Article 18th Section of the Articles of War and do sentence him to be dismiss'd the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander in Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Lieutt. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the Army never to return; The Drummers and Fifers to attend on the Grand Parade at Guard mounting for that Purpose

...Observe that the Father of our country viewed "sodomy" (the 18th-century word for homosexual relations) "with Abhorrence and Detestation." Homosexuality was treated as a criminal offense in all of the original thirteen colonies, and eventually every one of the fifty states (see Robinson, 2003; "Sodomy Laws...," 2003). Severe penalties were invoked for those who engaged in homosexuality. In fact, few Americans know that the penalty for homosexuality in several states was death, including New York, Vermont, Connecticut, and South Carolina (Barton, 2000, pp. 306,482). Most people nowadays would be shocked to learn that Thomas Jefferson advocated "dismemberment" (castration) as the penalty for homosexuality in his home state of Virginia, and even authored a bill to that effect (1781, Query 14; cf. 1903, 1:226-227).

Numerous Challenging Scripture and Nature Points

1 Kings 14:24 - And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.

1 Kings 15:12 - And he (Asa) took away the sodomites out of the land, and removed all the idols that his fathers had made.

1 Kings 22:46 - And the remnant of the sodomites, which remained in the days of his father Asa, he (Jehoshaphat) took out of the land.

Some ads that ran prior to Election 2009: (http://www.familypolicy.net/ sent an email out Tue 11/3/2009 4:10 PM EST)
-- What is marriage for?:  http://www.youtube.com/user/FamilyPolicyNetwork#p/a/f/1/Ks6JXrz0hLI
-- Teaching homosexuality: http://www.youtube.com/user/FamilyPolicyNetwork#p/a/f/4/zukoa2_x0Vc
-- Whose bathroom is it?: http://www.youtube.com/user/FamilyPolicyNetwork#p/a/f/1/6P5mmmpt_G8
-- Reverse discrimination:  http://www.youtube.com/user/FamilyPolicyNetwork#p/a/u/0/mwE6NmaEdbo
-- Opposing homosexuality: http://www.youtube.com/user/FamilyPolicyNetwork#p/a/f/0/SPPiTJY-Rkg

'Gay marriage' squashes parental rights & religious liberty, experts say by Michael Foust -Some say the sky hasn't fallen in the nearly five years since "gay marriage" was legalized in Massachusetts, but Kris Mineau, a citizen and conservative activist in that state, begs to differ. Sure, he says, things may look the same on the surface, but if you dig a little deeper, you'll see dramatic cultural changes. Teachers are teaching children about homosexual families over the objections of parents. A major adoption agency has chosen to shut down rather than be forced to place children with homosexual couples. "The sky is falling in Massachusetts in two key areas: parental rights and religious liberty," Mineau, president of the Massachusetts Family Institute, told Baptist Press.

Don't Give Up Hope, Says Pro-Family Leader: Launches Free pdf Textbook Teaching How to Re-Build Family-Centered Culture Dr. Scott Lively is an attorney, pastor and international consultant on family issues with more than twenty years of ministry opposing the "gay" political agenda around the world.

For the past ten years, while lecturing and consulting on pro-family strategies in more than 30 countries, Dr. Lively has been writing the world's first textbook that teaches pro-family advocates how to defeat the homosexual agenda and reestablish family-centered culture in their respective nations.

Today, Dr. Lively released the book, "Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the 'Gay' Agenda" on the Internet as a free resource in pdf format.

"This is my free gift to the international pro-family movement," said Lively. "Everything I've learned in twenty years on the front lines of the 'culture war' is in this book. I want pro-family people to have free access to these insights, analysis and strategies so that they will know that there is still hope for re-building family- centered culture, and how they can achieve that goal.

"I have devoted thousands of hours of work and all of the skills and training I have acquired through my career to produce the most straightforward, concise and easy-to-understand guidance that I can," he added. "I've boiled it down to under 250 pages, addressing every significant aspect of the conflict between Christian and 'gay' social goals. My only restriction on the use of this book is that it may not be offered for sale, but must be given away freely. I offer whatever value it may have as a sacrifice to the Lord."

"Redeeming the Rainbow" is available for download online in the Resources section of www.defendthefamily.com, specifically www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resources/1889235. pdf

See further Resources below....

"Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other. The divine law, as discovered by reason and the moral sense, forms an essential part of both." --James Wilson, law lectures at the University of Pennsylvania

Military Chaplains Speak Up on Marriage and Homosexuality in the Military -- /Christian Newswire/ -- Before civilizations crumble, the last thing to hit the fan is government-sponsored, government-forced, homosexuality, sodomy, and pedophilia. Homosexuality is a psychiatric disorder and probably the worst sin described in the Holy Bible due to the permanent damage caused to what was or is or might have been a temple of the Spirit. The consequences are said to be nothing short of eternal damnation, by choice. It's a shame that the US military, historically known to be a beacon of morality and religious tolerance and freedom, while the civilian sector has engaged in immorality, is now having its nose shoved in the dirt of filth to make the Sinners-in-Chief in the highest echelons of politics--the perverts, the pedophiles, and the psychiatrically ill--feel better about themselves.
   Retired Military Chaplain Jim Linzey, a Baptist minister, states that "the teachings of the Church are an elaboration of the laws that Jesus gave when He said, 'But from the beginning of the creation, God "made them male and female." "For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh"; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh' (Mark 10:6-8). Jesus' teaching emphasizes the unity between a man and his wife. Jesus also said, 'Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate' (Mark 10:9, NKJV). Based on Jesus' statement, it is a moral obligation to remain married once the marriage is consummated." There is a biblical basis for separation. "But the point is that marriage between men and women are the foundation of society, including military society," said Chaplain Valerie Potter, who is Methodist.  
   Military couples face many trials, including separations due to deployments. Chaplains have a crucial role to counsel them, to help them keep their marriages intact. As Chaplain Frank Johnson, a Baptist minister, said, "Marriage is a combat multiplier in that it gives married troops hope and a reason to fight well, defending ones country, of which marriage and families are the foundation; it gives troops a reason to live and come home." "But homosexuality is a combat divider, dividing one's reason to live while taking breaks on the combat field to change diapers all because their treacherous sin causes them to lose control of their bowels," said Chaplain John R. Kauffman, a Pentecostal minister. "How do you win a war like that? What a spectacle in the face of moral Muslims who detest homosexuality," he continued.   As a military chaplain, Rev. Linzey has counseled Soldiers struggling with homosexuality who left the military and some who had HIV. "Homosexuality was not a pleasant sin for these Soldiers," Linzey said. "They were laden with guilt and wished they could be freed from this most vile bondage, destroying their mental, spiritual, emotional, and physical well-being. But only a penitent heart in the soul of one who would receive the atoning sacrifice of Jesus the Christ can be free." God have mercy on the US military. 

New Hampshire Considers 'Bathroom Bill' - Last week, New Hampshire's House Judiciary Subcommittee voted 3-2 to pass a bill that would open all public restrooms and locker rooms to people of the opposite sex. Family advocates are concerned that by adding the words "gender expression" into the list of anti-discrimination laws, it will make New Hampshire's public bathrooms a haven for sexual predators. Bruce Hausknecht, judicial analyst for Focus on the Family Action, said the government is failing to protect its citizens. "These 'bathroom bills' provide the opportunity for peeping toms, pedophiles and sexual predators to walk into women's restrooms and locker rooms unchallenged, upsetting and endangering women and young girls," he said. "People suffering from gender confusion should receive therapy, not government endorsement. This bill is simply an attempt to appease the GLBT lobby at the expense of the safety of New Hampshire's citizens." Last June, Colorado passed a 'bathroom bill,' and shortly thereafter reports came in from women who were uncomfortable that men were using their restrooms. Pennsylvania is considering a similar bill.

Homosexuality and the Laws of Moral Physics J. Matt Barber - It makes front page news when conservative elected officials are accused of selling-out to monolithic corporate lobbies like Big Oil or Big Tobacco. Yet the media rarely take notice when liberal politicians toe the line for extreme ideological special interests.

Case in point: Within minutes after swearing in, President Obama had the White House web site updated to declare his unconditional support for every demand of the politically powerful and very well-funded homosexual lobby (a.k.a., "Big Homo"). By announcing to the world his pro-gay agenda, Obama has thrown gasoline on smoldering culture war embers, generating a firestorm of controversy.

...Evidently, Christ failed to clear His marriage definition with Barack Obama and Big Homo. Notice, that rather conspicuously, He did not say: "At the beginning the Creator made them gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT). For this reason a male, female or shemale will leave his, her or whatchahoozie's father and mother, father and father or mother and mother and be united to his or her wife “and/or husband“ and the two or more will become one flesh. Not that there's anything wrong with that."

...Christ's Apostle Paul rhetorically asked in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."

"Gay affirming" churches, which engage in what I call "a la carte Christianity" (take what you like, leave what you don't) are really just "sin affirming" churches. And "gay friendly" politicians, like Barack Obama, who push an anti-Christian homosexual agenda, are really just "immorality friendly" politicians.

Fortunately, as untold thousands of ex-"gays" can attest, God's word also offers hope and freedom from the homosexual lifestyle. 1 Corinthians 6:11, says, "And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God."

The Consequences of Homosexual Marriage are REAL, The Science it is Based on is NOT Faith2Action.org has produced a provocative marriage video, with help from Tony Perkins, Don Wildmon and others, that shows the harsh reality of the consequences of homosexual marriage. The lie that is perpetrated says that homosexuals are born with a "gay gene" and because of that we are to accept them just as they are and allow them to redefine marriage and family life to fit their lifestyle. In 2008 the American Psychological Association put out a revised publication that included the admission that there is no "gay" gene. As the video points out, the truth is there are thousands of ex-homosexuals living happy, healthy, fulfilling lives. I urge you to view the five minute video in its entirety by selecting on the following link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brIvfpIqvx8&feature=channel

Response to those who believe that being gay is a 'gift' from God?

How do they in turn respond to the following Scriptures:

(KJV unless specified otherwise.) 

Genesis 18:20 - And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; 

Genesis 19:15 - And when the morning arose, then the angels hastened Lot, saying, Arise, take thy wife, and thy two daughters, which are here; lest thou be consumed in the iniquity of the city. 

Jude 1:7,17-19 - Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. ...But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit.  

Jesus - Matthew 19:4-6 - Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.  

Romans 1:24-27  - For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections; for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature; And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. 

Leviticus 18:22, 20:13 -  You shall not lie with mankind as with womankind; it is an abomination. If a man also lie with mankind, as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. 

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - Or do you not know that the unrighteousness will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Stop being deceived: neither fornicators nor idolaters nor adulterers nor effeminate nor homosexuals nor thieves nor covetous people nor drunkards, nor abusive people, nor swindlers will inherit the Kingdom of God. (Power New Testament) 

2 Peter 2:6-10 - And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an example unto those that after should live ungodly; And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;) The Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished: But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, self willed, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.  

Matthew 11:23-24 - And you, Capernaum, which is exalted unto heaven, shall be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done here, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for you. Jesus 

Luke 17:26-30 - And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed. 

Deuteronomy 23:17-18 - There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel. Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog (* keleb), into the house of the LORD thy God for any vow: for even both these are abomination unto the LORD thy God. (* keleb -- from an unused root means. to yelp, or else to attack; a dog; hence (by euphemism) a male prostitute: KJV -- dog.) 

Deuteronomy 32:28-33 - For they are a nation void of counsel, neither is there any understanding in them. O that they were wise, that they understood this, that they would consider their latter end! How should one chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight, except their Rock had sold them, and the LORD had shut them up? For their rock is not as our Rock, even our enemies themselves being judges. For their vine is of the vine of Sodom, and of the fields of Gomorrah: their grapes are grapes of gall, their clusters are bitter: Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.

Isaiah 3:9 - The show of their countenance does witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves. 

Jeremiah 23:14 - I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem an horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies: they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none doth return from his wickedness: they are all of them unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah. 

Jude 1:7 - Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. 

1 Timothy 1:10 (PNT)
fornicators, homosexuals, kidnappers, liars, perjurers, and any other one who acts contrary to sound teaching.

See links above and information below for more.

"Reprobate Mind, to do the shameful things"

Romans 1: 26-32 (Power New Testament) Because of this God gave them over into vile passion of disgrace, and indeed their females exchanged the natural function for that contrary to nature, and likewise also the males who neglected the natural function with the females. They were inflamed in their lustful passion with one another, males performing the unseemly deed with males and receiving the reward which was necessary for their deceit in repayment for their sin. And since they did not see fit to have true knowledge of God, God gave them over into an unrighteous (reprobate) mind, to do the shameful things, since they were filled with every unrighteousness, wickedness, avarice, desire to injure. full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, evil habits, whisperers, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant, braggart, contriving evil, refusing to obey parents, without understanding, covenant breaking, without natural affection without mercy: who, although they know the ordinances of God thoroughly, because they are practicing such things as these that are worth of death, not only are they doing them but they are applauding others who do them.

Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. Jesus - Matthew 19:4-6

"But ambitious encroachments of the federal government, on the authority of the State governments, would not excite the opposition of a single State, or of a few States only. They would be signals of general alarm... But what degree of madness could ever drive the federal government to such an extremity." James Madison - Author of the U. S. Constitution (Federalist No. 46, 29 January 1788)

"The most important consequence of marriage is, that the husband and the wife become in law only one person... Upon this principle of union, almost all the other legal consequences of marriage depend." James Wilson

Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. ...But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts. These be they who separate themselves, sensual, having not the Spirit. Jude 1:7,17-19

The Constitution Does Not Permit Polygamy or Same-Sex Marriage MichNews.com, March 18, 2005 (Extreme Conservative) - Thomas Jefferson drafted a bill concerning Virginia's criminal law providing that the penalty for sodomy should be castration. See Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, ed. (Washington, Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904) Vol. I, pp.226-27, from Jefferson's "For Proportioning Crimes and Punishments." The bill read: "Whosoever shall be guilty of rape, polygamy, or sodomy with a man or woman, shall be punished; if a man, by castration, a woman, by boring through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch in diameter at the least." (Virginia Bill number 64; authored by Jefferson; 18 June 1779)

See "buggery" in state laws: Supreme Court of the United States _______ No. 02-102 (pdf) "Buggery is . . . committed by carnall knowledge against the ordinance of the Creator and order of nature, by mankind with mankind, or with brute beast, or by womankind with bruite beast."  Edward Coke, The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England 58-59 (1641). Thus, the term included anal intercourse between two men. See also Stafford's Case, 12 Co. Rep. 36, 37, 77 Eng. Rep. 1318 (1607)

What same-sex "marriage" has done to Massachusetts It's far worse than most people realize by Brian Camenker - Anyone who thinks that same-sex "marriage" is a benign eccentricity which won't affect the average person should consider what it has done in Massachusetts. It's become a hammer to force the acceptance and normalization of homosexuality on everyone. And this train is moving fast. What has happened so far is only the beginning. The public schools - Public health - Domestic violence - Legal profession - Adoption of children to homosexual "married" couples - Government mandates - The public square - The media. Homosexual "marriage" hangs over society like a hammer with the force of law. And it's only just begun. It's pretty clear that the homosexual movement's obsession with marriage is not because large numbers of them actually want to marry each other. Research shows that homosexual relationships are fundamentally dysfunctional on many levels, and "marriage" as we know it isn't something they can achieve, or even desire. (In fact, over the last three months, the Sunday Boston Globe's marriage section hasn't had any photos of homosexual marriages. In the beginning it was full of them.) This is about putting the legal stamp of approval on homosexuality and imposing it with force throughout the various social and political institutions of a society that would never accept it otherwise. To the rest of America: You've been forewarned.

Myth: Same-sex marriage does not impact heterosexual marriages or society as a whole.

Parents are losing the right to oversee/direct the sexual education of their children in states like Massachusetts, where same-sex "marriage" is recognized as the moral equivalent to natural marriage.

A church that holds a biblically orthodox view of marriage and sexuality could lose its tax-exempt status as a result of the recognition of special rights for one sexual behavior.

Small-business owners cannot operate without agreeing to compromise their deeply held biblical beliefs.

"There is no such thing as 'a homosexual.' Homosexuality is not what you are. It's what you do." Stephen Bennett

15 Reasons Why Homosexuality is Wrong and Hurts Society "The wicked strut about on every side when vileness is exalted among the sons of men." Psalm 12:8 - Biblical Family Advocates passionately implores Pastors and Churches to educate themselves regarding the Biblical and societal implications of engaging in homosexuality. Readers are encouraged to go to the Biblical Family Advocates website and read the article, "15 Reasons Why Homosexuality is Wrong and Hurts Society." The article discusses such things as the higher infidelity and domestic violence rates of homosexual relationships, why homosexuality is not genetic, as well as understanding why the Bible cannot support homosexual marriage. More importantly, it offers links and insights as to how those who are caught in the bondage of homosexuality can be set free.

Will this be the lifestyle and American way of life for our descendents in America?

What the mainstream media doesn't report: The increase in children being born out of wedlock in Scandinavia since marriage was redefined! William Murray, the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, warns of the dangers of legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States. He says Scandinavia has had nearly a decade of legal homosexual marriage, and it has nearly destroyed the institution of marriage altogether. More details: http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/4/132004c.asp (Excerpts: ...In Scandinavia, illegitimate birth rates exceed 50 percent. The majority of Swedish and Norwegian children are born out of wedlock, and 60 percent of first-born children in Denmark have unmarried parents. Meanwhile, marriage rates subtly decline while, in some countries, divorce rates have skyrocketed to nearly 80 percent. ...Still, as Kurtz noted, such studies have been done. He says they showed that "throughout Scandinavia (and the West) cohabiting couples with children break up at two to three times the rate of married parents. So rising rates of cohabitation and out-of-wedlock birth stand as proxy for rising rates of family dissolution.")

The High Cost of Aids - The James Hartline Report On The Frontlines of the Culture War January 29, 2007 - The Great Rainbow Robbery: Gay Activists Costing America Billions Of Dollars In Medical Expenses To Pay For Unsafe Sex Practices

Redeemed!10 Ways to Get Out of the Gay Life, If You Want Out by Charlene E. Cothran, Venus Magazine Publisher

 "During the Supreme Court hearings in 2000 on the Boy Scout case, pro-life Rev. Rob Schenck was sitting in the audience next to the Clinton White House liaison for 'gay' issues. Thinking the pastor was a fellow liberal, the woman whispered, 'We're not going to win this case, but that's okay. Once we get 'hate crime' laws on the books, we're going to go after the Scouts and all the other bigots.''

Violating "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God."

"It is not necessary to enumerate the many advantages, that arise from this custom of early marriages.  They comprehend all the society can receive from this source; from the preservation, and increase of the human race.  Every thing useful and beneficial to man, seems to be connected with obedience to the laws of his nature, the inclinations, the duties, and the happiness of individuals, resolve themselves into customs and habits, favourable, in the highest degree, to society.  In no case is this more apparent, than in the customs of nations respecting marriage." -- Samuel Williams (The Natural and Civil History of Vermont, 1794) Reference: American Political Writing during the Founding Era: 1760-1805, Hyneman and Lutz, ed., vol. 2 (952)

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." The second paragraph continues: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness...." Opening paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, America's Founding Document

Can a moral wrong be a "civil" right? Secular liberal progressives have implied that what is written in the opening paragraph of the Declaration of Independence no longer applies to today's society, indicating that "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God," which set up the boundary for how "Rights" are to be "entitled" is now outdated. So what is the "new and improved" basis in determining how "Rights" are "entitled?" What new wisdom is being employed? Have lawmakers overruled the founder's Biblical worldview of moral virtue and replaced it with a liberal secular progressive worldview whereby the "Laws of Nature" no longer apply?

"A compromise which results in a half-step toward evil is all wrong." Theodore Roosevelt

From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003] [Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between   January 7, 2003 and February 12, 2003] [CITE: 1USC7] THE CODE OF LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TITLE 1--GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1--RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Sec. 7. Definition of ``marriage'' and ``spouse'' In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ``marriage'' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ``spouse'' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. (Added Pub. L. 104-199, Sec. 3(a), Sept. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2419.)

A Bill Sponsored by Homosexual Congressman Barney Frank of Massachusetts, who once ran a homosexual prostitution ring out of his home, will amend Title 1 of the United States Code, to eliminate any Federal policy on the definition of marriage. Another Bill will also amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act giving "Special Rights" to homosexuals, by forcing every organization is America, Churches, Day Care Centers, Nursing Homes, Schools, etc. to hire gays and lesbians as teachers, coaches, doctors, etc.

Herbert Hoover - "When there is a lack of honor in government, the morals of the whole people are poisoned. There is no such thing as a no-man's land between honesty and dishonesty. Our strength lies in spiritual concepts. It lies in public sensitiveness to evil. Our greatest danger is not from invasion by foreign armies. Our dangers are that we may commit suicide from within by complaisance with evil, or by public tolerance of scandalous behavior."


Home | About | Search | Newsletter | Contact

Wall of Separation? Index