Will this be the lifestyle and American way of life for our descendents in America?

What the mainstream media doesn't report: The increase in children being born out of wedlock in Scandinavia since marriage was redefined! William Murray, the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, warns of the dangers of legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States. He says Scandinavia has had nearly a decade of legal homosexual marriage, and it has nearly destroyed the institution of marriage altogether. More details: http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/4/132004c.asp (Excerpts: ...In Scandinavia, illegitimate birth rates exceed 50 percent. The majority of Swedish and Norwegian children are born out of wedlock, and 60 percent of first-born children in Denmark have unmarried parents. Meanwhile, marriage rates subtly decline while, in some countries, divorce rates have skyrocketed to nearly 80 percent. ...Still, as Kurtz noted, such studies have been done. He says they showed that "throughout Scandinavia (and the West) cohabiting couples with children break up at two to three times the rate of married parents. So rising rates of cohabitation and out-of-wedlock birth stand as proxy for rising rates of family dissolution.")

"The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made." Groucho Marx

Prime examples: Tim Gill and Kevin Jennings

Who is Tim Gill?

Gay Activist Tim Gill and Friends Claim Victory in 106 Races by Jennifer Mesko - For years, homosexual multi-millionaire Tim Gill and his like-minded friends have shrewdly targeted key legislative races to defeat candidates who support traditional marriage and family values. In 2004, Gill and his friends poured millions into Gill's home state of Colorado and gave control of the Legislature to those favoring the homosexual agenda. In 2006, they expanded, targeting 70 key races in Colorado and other states and winning an astonishing 50. This year (2008) was no different. In addition to investing millions to — unsuccessfully — fight marriage amendments in Arizona, California and Florida, Gill and like-minded contributors supported candidates in at least 147 state races and won 106 of them.

Read more about Tim Gill and his gay-activist friends, and learn which races they targeted this year. Also, watch a special video report in which Gill reveals his agenda.

Who is Joining Tim Gill on the Campaign Trail?

TIME Magazine Profiles the 'Gay Mafia'

Gay Activists Target Smaller Races

Tim Gill makes a Rare Public Appearance at Democratic National Convention

CBN News Uncovers Tim Gill's Agenda

Atlantic Monthly Unveils Network of Gay Political Donors

Are Your State Lawmakers Under Attack?
Click on Your State to Find Out.

Tim Gill and Like-Minded Donors

Behind the scenes, software mogul Tim Gill and his friends are ambitiously campaigning to remake American politics in accord with homosexual activism.

Tim Gill Contributes Millions to Homosexual Activism Software mogul Tim Gill supports carefully selected candidates across the nation with an eye on influencing legislation. Watch the CBN report about Tim Gill.

The Gay Mogul Changing U.S. Politics Philanthropist Tim Gill Gill Foundation - In a new list of the most powerful gay men and women in the country, Out magazine has lots of household names at the top: David Geffen, Ellen DeGeneres, Rosie O'Donnell, Barney Frank and a couple of allegedly closeted stars. But high among the rich and famous is Tim Gill. Huh? Who is he, and why is he ranked as the fourth most powerful gay person in the country? Gill is a 53-year-old snowboarder, retired computer programmer and multimillionaire. He made his fortune (estimated at $425 million by Forbes magazine) by founding Quark, the pioneering desktop publishing software company. After selling the firm, he started the Gill Foundation, which has invested $110 million nationwide in gay causes over the past decade. The Gill Action Fund threw $15 million into a dozen states during the 2006 midterm elections, targeting 70 politicians regarded as unhelpful to gay causes: 50 went down. And the fund is helping transform the political face of Colorado. ...And recognizing that most anti-gay initiatives are born at the state level, Gill has developed a national political strategy based on successes in Colorado. "They've taken an in-state model and applied it to the entire country," says Denver political analyst Floyd Ciruli. "Gill [and his people are] incredibly strategic. They simply don't waste money. They put their funding where they can take control of legislatures." Ciruli adds, "People were unaware of what was going on for quite awhile, but now I think everybody knows that they have really changed the direction of the state. I'm not sure that everyone really understands how potent [Gill] is, but he now has to be the number one gay rights advocate in the country in terms of funding and strategy. They're taking significant contributions and putting them brilliantly in legislative environments where a few seats changing will change the entire control of a state."

They Won’t Know What Hit Them - The software mogul Tim Gill has a mission: Stop the Rick Santorums of tomorrow before they get started. How a network of gay political donors is stealthily fighting sexual discrimination and reshaping American politics - Together, Gill and Trimpa decided to eschew national races in favor of state and local ones, which could be influenced in large batches and for much less money. Most antigay measures, they discovered, originate in state legislatures. Operating at that level gave them a chance to “punish the wicked,” as Gill puts it—to snuff out rising politicians who were building their careers on antigay policies, before they could achieve national influence. Their chief cautionary example of such a villain is Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, who once compared homosexuality to “man on dog” sex (and was finally defeated last year, at a cost of more than $20 million). Santorum got his start working in the state legislature. As Gill and Trimpa looked at their evolving plan, it seemed realistic. “The strategic piece of the puzzle we’d been missing—consistent across almost every legislature we examined—is that it’s often just a handful of people, two or three, who introduce the most outrageous legislation and force the rest of their colleagues to vote on it,” Gill explained. “If you could reach these few people or neutralize them by flipping the chamber to leaders who would block bad legislation, you’d have a dramatic effect.” ...“If you want a majority, you have to change people’s minds,” he said, noting that in Colorado, Republicans outnumber Democrats. “Just because you’re conservative doesn’t mean you’re antigay.” With that in mind, he assembled a bipartisan team of political operatives and tested his theory in 2004, quietly targeting three antigay Colorado incumbents; two of them went down. Through the combined efforts of a host of progressive interest groups, including many supported by Gill, Democrats captured both chambers of the legislature for the first time in forty years. Gill’s decision to back Democrats in Colorado was the only choice that would produce the gay-tolerant leadership he’s pursuing. But ten years from now, he told me, he hopes he’ll be able to give evenly to Republicans and Democrats. Convinced his approach was sound, Gill decided to go big. When I visited his headquarters last fall, liberals were working alongside conservatives on a list compiled by his top consultants—one a national Democratic consultant, the other a former Karl Rove protégé—of seventy races in which a key antigay candidate was vulnerable or the outcome of a race was likely to affect control of the legislature. The list included state legislators, governors, and judges, not just Republicans but Democrats as well—like Philip Travis, the Democratic legislator leading the push to overturn gay marriage in Massachusetts. ...One component of Gill’s strategy includes courting that element of the Republican Party that’s open to compromise, while at the same time making clear that gay bashing will now come at a price. “You have to create an atmosphere of fear and respect,” said Trimpa, “and set up the proper context for them to do the right thing.” But neither Gill’s checkbook nor the Republicans’ woes have stopped social conservatives from pressing their agenda. Last year, when it became clear that Colorado Republicans intended to back a ballot initiative banning gay marriage, Gill and his allies moved first to frame the debate by pushing Referendum I, a bill endorsing domestic partnerships, and spending $5 million to promote it.

Homosexual activist Kevin Jennings, director of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) describing how immorality got a foothold in the Massachusetts schools by using "safety" as an issue." "We immediately seized upon the opponent's calling card -- safety -- and explained how homophobia represents a threats to students' safety by creating a climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common. Tilting our report, 'Making Schools Safe for Gay and Lesbian Youth,' we automatically threw our opponents onto the defensive and stole their best line of attack. This....short-circuited their arguments and left them back-peddling from day one."

Framing the issue - How the homosexual movement got into the Massachusetts schools. The homosexual movement's lies and deceptions -- claiming "safety" and "suicide prevention". Dec. 1, 1996 - Read their own words from 1995 speech bragging about how they tricked the Massachusetts Legislature. The following is from a speech entitled "Winning the Culture War" by Kevin Jennings, Executive Director of the "Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network" (GLSEN). It was delivered at the "Human Rights Campaign Fund Leadership Conference" -- a national homosexual activists' event -- on March 5, 1995. In this landmark speech to the national gay movement, Jennings described how GLSEN and Gov. Weld's "Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth" brought homosexuality programs into Massachusetts schools by purposefully confusing the argument in order to intimidate critics. Since then, it's been used as a model for getting their propaganda into school districts across America. (In the first sentence, note the "big lie" technique of marginalizing normal, mainstream opposition as "the Radical Right.")

Many are being duped, many more just don't care or are too busy to take notice of what kind of "civilization" this generation is leaving for our descendents. Is Satan using those who assault Judeo-Christian faiths to undermine the natural marriage and family? Is this Satan's final assault and the reason for high divorce rates and the support of same-sex marriage by "those with reprobate minds?" Is it the evil one's last gasp attempt to destroy the very fabric and foundation of how "civil" societies are based? Will the chaos being experienced by children in Scandinavia (see below) permeate throughout the world because Christians are unable to judge without hypocrisy and thus have relinquished their call to be the salt and light of the world?  Do you know how important marriage is to God, which is why He uses marriage as an analogy for Christ and the Church, in becoming as one? Is marriage between one man and one woman and the natural family being the very core of civilizations the reason Satan has targeted marriage, using those whose mind he has blinded to the Gospel of Christ? (2 Corinthians 4)

Among those who have been duped include the mainstream media, secular liberal politicians (even those who may claim to be Christian), public school administrators, most college professors, and most disturbingly judges. These are those who have bought into the misguided ploy that the new redefined "politically correct" definitions of words like discrimination, tolerance, diversity, hate, fear, and bigotry to falsely target the Judeo-Christian faith as being hateful. These are those whom the Scriptures refer to as having a reprobate mind and used hidden things of dishonesty, walking in craftiness, and handling the word of God deceitfully have fooled many under the guise of "rights, safety, and bullying" Yet many considered wise in this world have succumbed lock stock and barrel and are now promoting that which is evil.

CNSNews.com report "Same-Sex Marriage Debate Moves Into Schools" shows that homosexual-rights activists are invading our public schools to secure gullible disciples of their dangerous social agenda. The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) has printed a "curriculum guide" for public school teachers that presents a six-point lesson plan that is designed to convince students that homosexual relationships are the equivalent of traditional man-woman relationships (http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/library/record/1411.html ). "The lesson plans range from discussing the 'historical parallels' of same-sex marriage to providing students with the chance to read books about homosexual relations and then consider what it would be like to be in a same-sex wedding," CNSNews reported. Sandi Martinez, the Massachusetts state director of Concerned Women for America., told CNSNews, "Quite often parents aren't allowed to even know what's going on."

The deception to get access to "the impressionable children." Culture and Family Institute analyst Pete LaBarbera was among those who addressed the conferees attending the Concerned Women for America's national convention in Washington recently. He told the gathering's supporters that homosexual activists are getting "nastier." LaBarbera expressed that he has seen Kevin Jennings, the leader of the Gay, Lesbian Straight Education Network, use a "very bad four-letter word" -- in a church no less, that LaBarbera notes was formerly Norman Vincent Peale's church in New York City. LaBarbera said Jennings used that four-letter word to describe his attitude toward "hard-core bigots" -- which, LaBarbera says, "is people like us." LaBarbera told conferees that homosexual activists are giving up efforts to convert Christians to their side, and instead will concentrate on the moderates in society and "the impressionable children." AgapePress News Summary September 27, 2002
Reading, Writing and ? Homosexuality? by Doug Giles (2/21/2004) Gone are the Norman Rockwell days of sending young Scooter off to school with his satchel slung over his shoulder, PBJ sandwich in his Superman lunch box and a wide-eyed expectancy of learning, the kind that makes individuals and nations great.... And now I’m an officially ticked off father, as just the other day without warning and without notice both my daughters were exposed to “It’s Okay to Be Gay” propaganda presented by high school students to their classmates, including my daughters, with the approval of their high school and middle school teachers.... Teachers and kids can’t talk about Jesus Christ, Moses or Biblical ethics -- at least not in a positive, plausible sense -- in the classroom.  But it’s just fine to talk about Timmy and Tommy, the Testicle Twins?  About Daddy’s male roommate?  About anal sex and oral sex between teenagers of the same sex?   What in the world is going on? Parents, the innocence you work your butts off trying to provide your kids is being eroded, undermined or at the very least under-valued within the NEW public school systems. (See the complete article.) 

And then there's the ACLU.....

"During the Supreme Court hearings in 2000 on the Boy Scout case, pro-life Rev. Rob Schenck was sitting in the audience next to the Clinton White House liaison for 'gay' issues. Thinking the pastor was a fellow liberal, the woman whispered, 'We're not going to win this case, but that's okay. Once we get 'hate crime' laws on the books, we're going to go after the Scouts and all the other bigots.''

Violating "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God."

"It is not necessary to enumerate the many advantages, that arise from this custom of early marriages.  They comprehend all the society can receive from this source; from the preservation, and increase of the human race.  Every thing useful and beneficial to man, seems to be connected with obedience to the laws of his nature, the inclinations, the duties, and the happiness of individuals, resolve themselves into customs and habits, favourable, in the highest degree, to society.  In no case is this more apparent, than in the customs of nations respecting marriage." -- Samuel Williams (The Natural and Civil History of Vermont, 1794) Reference: American Political Writing during the Founding Era: 1760-1805, Hyneman and Lutz, ed., vol. 2 (952)

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation." The second paragraph continues: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness...." Opening paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, America's Founding Document

Can a moral wrong be a "civil" right? Secular liberal progressives have implied that what is written in the opening paragraph of the Declaration of Independence no longer applies to today's society, indicating that "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God," which set up the boundary for how "Rights" are to be "entitled" is now outdated. So what is the "new and improved" basis in determining how "Rights" are "entitled?" What new wisdom is being employed? Have lawmakers overruled the founder's Biblical worldview of moral virtue and replaced it with a liberal secular progressive worldview whereby the "Laws of Nature" no longer apply?

"A compromise which results in a half-step toward evil is all wrong." Theodore Roosevelt

From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003] [Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between   January 7, 2003 and February 12, 2003] [CITE: 1USC7] THE CODE OF LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TITLE 1--GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1--RULES OF CONSTRUCTION Sec. 7. Definition of ``marriage'' and ``spouse'' In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word ``marriage'' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word ``spouse'' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. (Added Pub. L. 104-199, Sec. 3(a), Sept. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2419.)

A Bill Sponsored by Homosexual Congressman Barney Frank of Massachusetts, who once ran a homosexual prostitution ring out of his home, will amend Title 1 of the United States Code, to eliminate any Federal policy on the definition of marriage. Another Bill will also amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act giving "Special Rights" to homosexuals, by forcing every organization is America, Churches, Day Care Centers, Nursing Homes, Schools, etc. to hire gays and lesbians as teachers, coaches, doctors, etc.

Herbert Hoover - "When there is a lack of honor in government, the morals of the whole people are poisoned. There is no such thing as a no-man's land between honesty and dishonesty. Our strength lies in spiritual concepts. It lies in public sensitiveness to evil. Our greatest danger is not from invasion by foreign armies. Our dangers are that we may commit suicide from within by complaisance with evil, or by public tolerance of scandalous behavior."

As a resource on the dangers of homosexuality, Dr. John Diggs' "The Health Risks of Gay Sex," is available online through the Corporate Resource Council at: http://www.corporateresourcecouncil.org/white_papers/Health_Risks.pdf.

Also, the following is the full quotation by "gay" writer Jack Hart, available on the Culture & Family Institute's website at http://www.cwfa.org/articles/3962/CFI/cfreport/:

QUOTE: Sodomy: Efficient Disease Transmitter

[Warning: upsetting material]

The following excerpt comes not from Rev. Jerry Falwell or the "religious right," but a homosexual writer, Jack Hart:

"Many sexually transmitted diseases (STD's) occur more often among gay men than in the general population. Several factors contribute to this difference: Gay men have the opportunity to engage in sex with more people than do most heterosexual men, and some practices common in the gay community -- especially rimming ["gay" slang for oral-anal stimulation] and anal intercourse [sodomy] -- are highly efficient ways of transmitting disease…."-- Jack Hart, author, Gay Sex: A Manual for Men Who Love Men (Allyson Publications: Boston, 1991), p. 156, in section on "Sexually Transmitted Disease." The writer goes on to write that "the increasing acceptance of safer sex" has lessened the spread of STD's, and then discusses the "most common" sex-transmitted diseases other than HIV confronting homosexual men, including: chlamydia, crab lice, giardiasis, gonorrhea, hepatitis-A and -B, herpes simplex, nongonococcal urethritis, scabies, syphilis, and venereal warts.

• Facts & Consequences The health risks associated with violating "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God."
• Facts on Sodomy
• Not My Child: Contemporary Paganism and the New Spirituality by Linda Harvey (Chattanooga, TN: AMG Publishers, 2008) Review here.
• Hope for the homosexual
• Gender Identity, The Homosexual Agenda and The Christian Response 
• Education in America
• Americans for Truth is dedicated to telling the full truth about the homosexual, bisexual and "transgender" lifestyles, and the well-funded "gay" political groups that advance this agenda. 
• Theological Education Institute A Vision for "First the Gospel, then Politics..." - A Passion for "The Love of Hard Questions
• Urban Legends Dedicated to the Defense of Civil Liberties and Human Rights

• MarriageDebate.com, a project of the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, aspires to be that place for the same-sex marriage debate. Will same-sex marriage hurt or help marriage as asocial institution? At MarriageDebate.com, that is the question. No partisan politics. No pulled punches. No shouting matches. Just a relentlessly honest look at all sides of the question by interesting people who care about marriage.

• http://www.aboutscales.com/kinseyscale Source for more links on facts and homosexual lifestyle consequences
• Homosexuality: The Threat to the Family and the Attack on Marriage
• Mission America
• MassResistance.com
• Parents and Friends of Gays (PFOX)
• Social acceptance DOES NOT prevent health and emotional problems
• Same-Sex Marriage: Putting Every Household at Risk by Mathew D. Staver 153 pages Paperback - $10.00
• International Organization of Heterosexual Rights